Skip to main content

Bryant v. State

Citations

  • 794 N.E.2d 1135
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1642
  • 2003 WL 22053736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the exclusion of a statement against interest was not a strong issue for appeal where the confession did not match the circumstances of the robbery with which the defendant was charged, the statement was uncorroborated, and it was not made to a disinterested witness
  • alleged confession was not statement against interest where statement did not match the circumstances of the crime at issue, was uncorroborated, and was made to the defendant
  • alleged confession was not statement against interest where statement did not match the circumstances of the crime at issue, was uncorroborated, and was made to the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Kirsch, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.