Bryant v. Recall for Lowell's Future Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the general tenor of the publication implied a statement of objective fact, in part because it “was provided in the recall petition as one of the ‘statements of reasons for demanding recall’ ”
• concluding that the general tenor of the publication implied a statement of objective fact, in part because it “was provided in the recall petition as one of the ‘statements of reasons for demanding recall’ ”
• applying the Neumann test to determine whether statements were “opinion” for pur- poses of an ORS 260.532 claim
• applying the Neumann test to determine whether statements were “opinion” for pur- poses of an ORS 260.532 claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).