Cook v. Corbett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overturning a primary nominating election because the winning candidate made false statements in the course of the campaign
• rejecting argument that, to be a material violation of the election laws, a false statement had to change the result of the election
• false statements in ads were deliberate and material violations and compelled forfeiture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).