Brown v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, shortly after Smith’s post-conviction proceedings were completed, that a defendant was “entitled to court-appointed counsel unless the district court determined that his petition for post-conviction relief was frivolous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DeRushé v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-22· cited 372×
• Charboneau v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2004-11-23· cited 356×
• Ramon L. Smith v. State of Idaho
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-11-30· cited 103×
• Plant v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2006-10-17· cited 98×
• Swader v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2007-01-25· cited 46×
• Woodrow Grant v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2014-04-25· cited 35×
• Judd v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-07-27· cited 22×
• Hust v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-06-23· cited 12×
• State v. Hooley
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2020-03-09· cited 9×
• Ramon L. Smith v. State of Idaho
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-09-07· cited 6×
• Jimenez v. State
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2022-05-26
• Tucker v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2026-03-30