Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 400 A.2d 1133
  • 285 Md. 105
  • 1979 Md. LEXIS 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Charging documents in this State now may be amended ... only in accord with Maryland Rule 713[.]” (emphasis added)
  • “we therefore hold that the amendment here constituted a substantive change that, being accomplished without the appellant’s consent, violated Rule 713 and requires vacation of the conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, C.J., and Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole and Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.