Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2/7/1980
Bolden v. State
Citations
- 410 A.2d 1085
- 44 Md. App. 643
- 1980 Md. App. LEXIS 225
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘[T]he law rightly gives room for allowing the conviction of those discovered upon showing sufficiently the essential nature of the plan and their connection with it, without requiring evidence of knowledge of all its details or of the participation of others.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Liss, Wilner, MacDaniel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-09-03· cited 46×
- Marks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-09-05· cited 31×
- State v. FarinholtCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-06· cited 17×
- Savage v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-29· cited 11×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-07-12· cited 8×
- United States v. HollandD. Maryland· 1980-08-01· cited 6×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-04-08· cited 5×
- Bordley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-06-27· cited 5×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 844×
- Blumenthal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-05· cited 757×
- Ross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-12· cited 201×
- United States v. Harry BernsteinSecond Circuit· 1976-03-04· cited 189×
- United States v. Cleophas James Kearney, United States of America v. Eugene Lemon, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 1977-08-22· cited 118×
- Cross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-05-04· cited 104×
- United States v. Sidney Levine and Mpd Film Productions, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1977-05-02· cited 101×
- United States v. Donald Anderson and Jack SmithNinth Circuit· 1976-03-30· cited 99×
- State v. SiegelCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-09-01· cited 92×
- United States v. Samuel F. ManariteSecond Circuit· 1971-11-09· cited 89×
- Couser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-03-10· cited 87×
- Corbin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-10· cited 78×
- United States v. Mario GiganteSecond Circuit· 1976-06-22· cited 67×
- State v. CerboSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1979-02-02· cited 65×
- Bartholomey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-02· cited 44×
- Couser v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1977-06-13· cited 42×
- United States v. DianaFourth Circuit· 1979-08-29· cited 42×
- Greenwald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-01-12· cited 30×
- Von Lusch v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-04-15· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.