Skip to main content

Brown v. Small

Citations

  • 825 P.2d 1209
  • 251 Mont. 414
  • 49 State Rptr. 98
  • 1992 Mont. LEXIS 22

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding expert testimony is ordinarily required in legal malpractice cases to establish the standard of care
  • noting that the complexity inherent in some cases makes arriving at a conclusion that is wholly \consistent with the evidence\ difficult if an expert is not provided (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • acknowledging expert testimony unnecessary where misconduct “ ‘is so obvious that no reasonable juror could not comprehend the lawyer’s breach of duty”’ (citation and emphasis omitted)
  • requiring expert testimony to establish attorney standard of care in case involving insurance coverage
  • court required expert testimony to establish attorney standard of care for case presenting insurance coverage questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trieweiler, Turnage, Harrison, Gray, Hunt, McDonough, Weber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.