Carlson v. Morton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that reference to rules of professional conduct are not sufficient to show a violation of the standard of care in the absence of expert proof
• discussing legal malpractice, and determining that expert testimony is required to establish that attorney departed from prevalent standard of care
• discussing legal malpractice, and determining that expert testimony is required to establish that attorney departed from prevalent standard of care
• whether a lawyer breached the applicable standard of care in a legal malpractice suit required expert testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).