Skip to main content

Harline v. Barker

Citations

  • 854 P.2d 595
  • 214 Utah Adv. Rep. 26
  • 1993 Utah App. LEXIS 91
  • 1993 WL 183111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing grant of summary judgment for defendant attorneys because a reasonable juror could have found that attorneys breached duty to Harline by failing to ask him about court orders needing attention or to investigate ongoing bankruptcy proceedings
  • “The duty of [an attorney] [is] to represent [a client] with ‘competence and diligence.’”
  • enumerating elements of legal malpractice based on negligence
  • \Proximate cause is an issue of fact.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Garff, Greenwood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.