Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/7/2014
Brown v. SAIF Corp.
Citations
- 262 Or. App. 640
- 325 P.3d 834
- 2014 WL 1819826
- 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 631
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that correct test to determine if a combined condition remains compensable is “whether claimant’s work-related injury incident is the major contributing cause of the combined condition”
- holding that correct test to determine if a combined condition remains compensable is “whether claimant’s work-related injury incident is the major contributing cause of the combined condition”
- reviewing legislative history of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) and noting that cosponsor of bill equated term “otherwise compensable injury” in statute with the “work injury,” the “industrial injury,” the “injury incident,” and the “work incident” (emphasis added)
- generally differentiating between the statutory phrases “compensable injury” and “accepted condition”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-30· cited 51×
- SAIF Corp. v. Carlos-MaciasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-07· cited 11×
- Akins v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-06-07· cited 6×
- Nacoste v. Halton Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-23· cited 5×
- Carrillo v. SAIFCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-17· cited 5×
- Easton v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-02· cited 4×
- Sather v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-07· cited 3×
- Magana-Marquez v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-21· cited 3×
- Fillinger v. Boeing Co. (In re Fillinger)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-14· cited 2×
- English v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-13· cited 2×
- Kiltow v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-03· cited 2×
- Carrillo v. SAIF Corp. (In re Carrillo)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-02· cited 1×
- Jewell v. SAIF Corp. (In re Jewell)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-16· cited 1×
- Vukasin v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-13· cited 1×
- Sather v. Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-07-08· cited 1×
- Allen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-06-22· cited 1×
- Brown v. SAIFOregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-30
- Saif Corp. v. Carlos-Macias (In re Comp. of Carlos-Macias)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-21
- Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. Deboard (In re Deboard)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-16
- Sieczkowski v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-09
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
- Hopkins v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 21×
- SAIF Corp. v. SpragueOregon Supreme Court· 2009-08-27· cited 19×
- Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeOregon Supreme Court· 2002-04-11· cited 19×
- SAIF Corp. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-09· cited 17×
- Multifoods Specialty Distribution v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-29· cited 14×
- SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-23· cited 14×
- SAIF Corp. v. NehlCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-05-21· cited 8×
- SAIF Corp. v. SwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 8×
- Sprague v. United States BakeryCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-05-11· cited 8×
- Sprague v. United States Bakery, Saif Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-07-13· cited 8×
- Schuler v. Beaverton School District No. 48JOregon Supreme Court· 2002-06-27· cited 7×
- Kenimer v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-07-31· cited 6×
- Reid v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-10-06· cited 1×
- Reid v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.