Skip to main content

Brown v. SAIF Corp.

Citations

  • 262 Or. App. 640
  • 325 P.3d 834
  • 2014 WL 1819826
  • 2014 Ore. App. LEXIS 631

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that correct test to determine if a combined condition remains compensable is “whether claimant’s work-related injury incident is the major contributing cause of the combined condition”
  • holding that correct test to determine if a combined condition remains compensable is “whether claimant’s work-related injury incident is the major contributing cause of the combined condition”
  • reviewing legislative history of ORS 656.005(7)(a)(B) and noting that cosponsor of bill equated term “otherwise compensable injury” in statute with the “work injury,” the “industrial injury,” the “injury incident,” and the “work incident” (emphasis added)
  • generally differentiating between the statutory phrases “compensable injury” and “accepted condition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Egan, Nakamoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.