Akins v. SAIF Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the board’s decision was supported by substantial evidence, despite the possibility that it could have also reasonably adopted the opposite conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2021-07-01· cited 6×
• SAIF v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-05-13· cited 5×
• Broeke v. SAIF
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-10-16· cited 1×
• Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-26· cited 1×
• SAIF v. Ward
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-10-21· cited 1×
• Farruggia v. Shops (In re Comp. of Farruggia)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-05-08

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Garcia v. Boise Cascade Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-02-22· cited 125×
• Brown v. SAIF Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-30· cited 51×
• Brown v. SAIF Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-05-07· cited 25×
• Rogue Advocates v. Jackson County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-23· cited 6×
• Oregon Drywall Systems, Inc. v. Bacon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-27· cited 5×
• Nacoste v. Halton Co.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-23· cited 5×
• Washington County - Risk v. Jansen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-02-29· cited 4×
• Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-04-16· cited 3×
• SAIF Corp. v. Custer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-05-01· cited 1×