Skip to main content
· 6/7/2017

Akins v. SAIF Corp.

Citations

  • 286 Or. App. 70
  • 398 P.3d 463
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding, as to motion for BVA reconsideration delivered to RO, that RO has no duty to forward to Board or return to appellant a motion for reconsideration by BVA that had been mistakenly submitted to RO

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Egan, Lagesen, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.