Skip to main content
· 5/1/1984

Senfeld v. Bank of Nova Scotia Trust Co.

Citations

  • 450 So. 2d 1157
  • 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13078

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that in civil theft claim, once jury sets the amount of actual damages, it is a ministerial act for the trial court to triple those damages and enter final judgment in that amount
  • finding that the prior version of the civil theft statute, then section 812.035, was remedial in nature
  • knowing recipient of mistaken payment liable for conversion and under civil theft statute
  • finding retroactive application of statute proper where statute incorporated previously criminal conduct
  • “[W]hile a demand and refusal constitute evidence that a conversion has occurred, it is unnecessary to prove a demand and refusal where the conversion can be otherwise shown.”
  • section 812.035(7) provides for tripling of actual damages awarded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Daniel S. Pearson and Ferguson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.