Oregon Supreme Court· 8/3/1982
Brown v. Oregon State Bar
Citations
- 648 P.2d 1289
- 293 Or. 446
- 1982 Ore. LEXIS 974
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing a justiciable controversy as “an actual and substantial controversy between parties having adverse legal interests” that “results in specific relief through a binding decree”
- describing a justiciable controversy as “an actual and sub- stantial controversy between parties having adverse legal interests” that “results in specific relief through a binding decree”
- considering discretion provided under ORS 28.060 and concluding that, “where a justiciable controversy exists and the trial court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the controversy, the court should afford relief absent valid countervailing reasons” (emphasis added)
- “To be justiciable, a controversy must involve present facts as opposed to a dispute which is based on future events of a hypothetical issue.”
- “The court cannot exercise jurisdiction over a nonjusticiable controversy because in the absence of constitutional authority, the court cannot render advisory opinions.”
- “Ajusticiable controversy results in specific relief through a binding decree as opposed to an advisory opinion!.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denecke, Lent, Linde, Tanzer, Peterson, Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
87 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
- Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court· 2015-07-16· cited 118×
- Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court· 1995-05-25· cited 82×
- McIntire v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court· 1996-01-19· cited 79×
- Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court· 2004-09-16· cited 72×
- Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-12-09· cited 71×
- Harris v. Cassia CountyIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-04-23· cited 63×
- Strunk v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court· 2005-03-08· cited 59×
- League of Oregon Cities v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2002-10-04· cited 58×
- MacPherson v. Department of Administrative ServicesOregon Supreme Court· 2006-02-21· cited 54×
- State v. HemenwayOregon Supreme Court· 2013-04-25· cited 44×
- Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-09-26· cited 42×
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. KupecWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1998-04-02· cited 40×
- Annable v. Board of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1986-04-07· cited 39×
- Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-01-17· cited 37×
- Kerr v. BradburyOregon Supreme Court· 2006-03-23· cited 36×
- US West Communications, Inc. v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court· 2003-12-18· cited 35×
- Noh v. CenarrusaIdaho Supreme Court· 2002-08-28· cited 35×
- At&T Communications of Pacific Northwest, Inc. v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 30×
- Pendleton School District 16R v. StateOregon Supreme Court· 2009-01-23· cited 27×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Cummings Construction Co. v. School District No. 9Oregon Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 60×
- Brooks v. DierkerOregon Supreme Court· 1976-07-29· cited 55×
- Recall Bennett Committee v. BennettOregon Supreme Court· 1952-10-08· cited 47×
- Lokey v. Texas Methodist FoundationCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1971-06-16· cited 5×
- Brown v. Oregon State BarCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-09-08· cited 3×
- State ex rel. State Dental Ass'n v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1954-05-05· cited 2×
Other cases named Brown v. Oregon State Bar
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.