Skip to main content
· 7/29/1976

Brooks v. Dierker

Citations

  • 552 P.2d 533
  • 275 Or. 619
  • 1976 Ore. LEXIS 827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the writ of review is “the normal vehicle for obtaining judicial review of the judi- cial and quasi-judicial actions of local governments”
  • identifying that basis for concluding that declaratory relief is not an appropriate remedy
  • considering whether the ability to pursue a nonexclusive writ of review to challenge an agency action was more appropriate than a declaratory judgment action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connell, Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Howell, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.