Skip to main content
· 2/12/2001

Brown v. Luker (In Re Zepecki)

Citations

  • 258 B.R. 719
  • 45 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1092
  • 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 71
  • 2001 WL 114692

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • payment for attorney to conduct a sham 1031 exchange in order to remove assets from what would become the bankruptcy estate was “in contemplation of” bankruptcy
  • payment for attorney to conduct a sham 1031 exchange in order to remove assets from what would become the bankruptcy estate was “in contemplation of” bankruptcy
  • attorney who represented debtor in pre-petition real estate sale was subject to § 329 and disgorgement because services were influenced by the imminence of the debtor’s filing
  • “A disgorgement is allowed only to the extent that the fees are excessive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kressel, Schermer, Dreher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.