· 2/12/2001
Brown v. Luker (In Re Zepecki)
Citations
- 258 B.R. 719
- 45 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1092
- 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 71
- 2001 WL 114692
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- payment for attorney to conduct a sham 1031 exchange in order to remove assets from what would become the bankruptcy estate was “in contemplation of” bankruptcy
- payment for attorney to conduct a sham 1031 exchange in order to remove assets from what would become the bankruptcy estate was “in contemplation of” bankruptcy
- attorney who represented debtor in pre-petition real estate sale was subject to § 329 and disgorgement because services were influenced by the imminence of the debtor’s filing
- “A disgorgement is allowed only to the extent that the fees are excessive.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kressel, Schermer, Dreher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.