· 5/11/1982
Matter of Swartout
Citations
- 20 B.R. 102
- 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4159
- 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 313
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that services related to the debtor’s divorce, although intertwined with his bankruptcy, were not in connection with the bankruptcy
- determining that services related to a debtor’s divorce proceeding were not connected to the bankruptcy case within the meaning of § 329
- determining that services related to a debtor’s divorce proceeding were not connected to the bankruptcy case within the meaning of § 329
- refusing a fee request from an attorney who handled the bankrupt’s divorce, finding that the divorce was not “ ‘connected with’ the [bankruptcy] case at bar as contemplated in 11 U.S.C. § 329(a)”
- in order for services to be “in contemplation of bankruptcy,” they should be influenced by, and a direct result of, the imminence of the debtor’s petition filing
- even mentioning how sections 524(a) and 727(b) would apply to prepetition legal services for a divorce
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Charles A. Anderson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.