Skip to main content
· 5/11/1982

Matter of Swartout

Citations

  • 20 B.R. 102
  • 1982 Bankr. LEXIS 4159
  • 9 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 313

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that services related to the debtor’s divorce, although intertwined with his bankruptcy, were not in connection with the bankruptcy
  • determining that services related to a debtor’s divorce proceeding were not connected to the bankruptcy case within the meaning of § 329
  • determining that services related to a debtor’s divorce proceeding were not connected to the bankruptcy case within the meaning of § 329
  • refusing a fee request from an attorney who handled the bankrupt’s divorce, finding that the divorce was not “ ‘connected with’ the [bankruptcy] case at bar as contemplated in 11 U.S.C. § 329(a)”
  • in order for services to be “in contemplation of bankruptcy,” they should be influenced by, and a direct result of, the imminence of the debtor’s petition filing
  • even mentioning how sections 524(a) and 727(b) would apply to prepetition legal services for a divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Charles A. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.