Drews v. Vote (In Re Vote)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• using federal law to determine the existence and scope of debtor's interest in federally created crop disaster relief payment
• noting that “a broad application of Segal might support a finding the CDP is property of the bankruptcy estate—The CDP payments are in some ways rooted in the prebankruptcy farming activities and are not ‘entangled’ in the Debtor's ability to make a fresh start”
• observing that “[a] close examination of [the] legislative history . . . reveals that Segal’s holding may be viable only to the extent that it applies to tax refunds received or to be received postpetition” and noting Segal’s “questionable applicability . . . to the facts of this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).