Skip to main content
· 3/26/1999

Brown v. Gino Morena Enterprises

Citations

  • 44 F. Supp. 2d 41
  • 161 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2350
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5274
  • 1999 WL 221855

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining supplemental jurisdiction under section 1367(c) without addressing section 1367(a) analysis
  • “[T]he Court must first determine whether plaintiffs [state law claims] are indeed pendent claims or whether they are preempted by § 301.”
  • “union’s settlement of a grievance does not constitute a breach of the duty of fair representation simply because the union does not obtain the full relief sought or because the affected union member is not satisfied with the terms of the settlement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stanley S. Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.