Brown v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “And while the appellant failed to make the full equity payment specified in the agreement, a lis pendens does not pertain upon a payment which is merely related to but which does not affect the alienability of the subject prop- erty.”
• “And while the appellant failed to make the full equity payment specified in the agreement, a lis pendens does not pertain upon a payment which is merely related to but which does not affect the alienability of the subject prop- erty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Gallo
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-07-20· cited 6×
• Joseph v. Estate of Joseph
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-21· cited 1×
• Gillian Emery v. Frank Gallo
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-07-20
• Emery, Gillian v. Gallo, Frank
  Seventh Circuit· 2009-07-20
• Alan L. Carner v. Nicole J. Carner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-06-10

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Argonaut Ins. Co. v. May Plumbing Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-07-03· cited 406×
• Lake Placid Holding Co. v. Paparone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-04-28· cited 18×
• Worldwide Dev.-Kendale Lakes West v. Lot Head., Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-12-31· cited 9×