Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/27/2018

Brown v. Brown

Citations

2018 Ohio 4741

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's Civ.R. 60(B) motion in case No. 18AP-269. The undisputed facts supported a finding that her delay in filing her motion was unreasonable. Additionally, because case No. 18AP-368 does not involve an appeal from a final appealable order, it must be dismissed. Judgment affirmed in case No. 18AP-269 appeal dismissed in case No. 18AP-368.

Judges: Luper Schuster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. To
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-09· cited 3×
In re Adoption of J.H.J.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-13
Westbrook v. Westbrook
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-11

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
Strack v. Pelton
Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 507×
Lantsberry v. Tilley Lamp Co.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1971-07-21· cited 137×
Harris v. Anderson
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-05-03· cited 101×
City of Riverside v. State
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-02· cited 36×
K. B. v. Columbus
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-16· cited 14×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.