· 3/13/2025

In re Adoption of J.H.J.

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 848

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in determining birth father's consent to the adoption was not required pursuant to R.C. 3107.07(A) where birth father failed to have more than de minimis contact with the child in the year preceding the filing of the adoption petition. Birth father did not file timely objections to the magistrate's decision, and birth father did not demonstrate plain error from the trial court's adoption of the magistrate's decision that his consent to the adoption was not required.

Judges: Edelstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.