New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 7/7/1999
Brown v. Brown
Citations
- 731 A.2d 1212
- 323 N.J. Super. 30
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- distinguishing between derivative actions, which are conditioned on injury or breach of duty to the corporation, and direct actions, involving injury sustained by a shareholder or member
- distinguishing between derivative actions which are conditioned on A-0879-19 18 injury or breach of duty to the corporation, and direct actions, involving injury sustained by, or violating a duty owed to a shareholder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judges Landau, Braithwaite and Wecker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Combs v. Pricewaterhousecoopers LLPTenth Circuit· 2004-09-08· cited 50×
- Tully v. MirzNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-11-29· cited 17×
- Sharkey v. Emery (In Re Sharkey)D. New Jersey· 2001-11-27· cited 5×
- Philipp v. StahlNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-10-03· cited 5×
- Sofia Design & Development at South Brunswick, LLC v. D'Amore (In re D'Amore)D. New Jersey· 2012-05-31· cited 5×
- Notaro v. Performance TeamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2016-02-24· cited 3×
- Schulman v. Wolff & Samson, PCNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2008-07-21· cited 2×
- Carstarphen v. MilsnerD. Nevada· 2010-01-05· cited 1×
- RICHARD W. TULLY, JR. VS. PETER MIRZ (L-5951-16, BERGEN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2018-11-29
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-05-02· cited 335×
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-03-12· cited 83×
- Edward F. BAGDON, Plaintiff-Appellee—Cross-Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., Defendant-Appellant—Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1990-11-13· cited 82×
- Integrated Solutions, Inc. v. Service Support Specialties, Inc.Third Circuit· 1997-08-22· cited 81×
- Barth v. BarthIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-12-29· cited 78×
- Strasenburgh v. StraubmullerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1996-10-23· cited 69×
- Di Tolvo v. Di TolvoNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1974-11-07· cited 59×
- Clarence v. Watson v. Woodrow C. ButtonNinth Circuit· 1956-06-22· cited 48×
- Derouen v. MurrayMississippi Supreme Court· 1992-07-08· cited 47×
- Richards v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-08-12· cited 45×
- Wessin v. Archives Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-05-13· cited 36×
- Lombardo v. HoagNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-11-30· cited 32×
- Johnson v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-09-19· cited 29×
- AYR Composition, Inc. v. RosenbergNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1993-01-08· cited 27×
- Drain v. Covenant Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-24· cited 25×
- Pogostin v. LeightonNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-01-29· cited 21×
- Village of Ridgewood v. Shell OilNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-04-01· cited 20×
- Pepe v. GMACNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-03-18· cited 19×
- Rowe Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 17×
- Kirk v. First Nat. Bank of ColumbusM.D. Georgia· 1977-10-20· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.