Pepe v. GMAC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting car dealership owner plaintiffs’ argument that “their role as guarantors of the debt of the dealerships establishe[d] a ‘special relationship’ creating duties owing directly to them”
• “Dismissal of [plaintiffs’] claims does not result in a wrong without a remedy. The remedy for misconduct of GMAC or any other party ... is in the hands of the bankruptcy trustee and the Bankruptcy Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).