Skip to main content

Brown v. Brown

Citations

  • 19 S.W.3d 717
  • 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 882
  • 2000 WL 721433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that moving party “ha[d] not met his burden of showing changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unreasonable”
  • holding that moving party “ha[d] not met his burden of showing changed circumstances so substantial and continuing as to make the terms unreasonable”
  • stating that the required showing of a substantial and con- timing change “may be established in other ways”
  • stating that the required showing of a substantial and con- timing change “may be established in other ways”
  • “[T]he factfinder is empowered, on the basis of credibility and demeanor evaluations, to completely disregard a witness’s testimony, even if that testimony is uncontroverted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stith, Ulrich, Smart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.