Kelly S. Keel v. Edward W. Keel, Respondent/Respondent.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying review of a trial court’s failure to make findings supporting custody modification
• finding “[t]he trial court made sufficient findings with respect to . . . the relevant general best[-]interest factors contained in [s]ection 452.375.2” where, unlike in this case, the judgment, (1) “set out the eight factors listed in [the statute]”; (2
• affirming the transfer of physical custody from mother to father based on the lower court’s analysis of the eight statutory factors despite the fact that “[n]o one maintains [mjother is not a good parent, or that [fjather is the better parent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).