Skip to main content

Brooks v. Jones

Citations

  • 578 S.W.2d 669

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when landowner and claimant of easement both use same way, use by claimant is not exclusive of owner’s use and therefore is not adverse
  • when landowner and claimant of easement both use same way, use by claimant is not exclusive of owner's use and therefore is not adverse
  • “A public dedication is enforceable by the public authorities of the state, county or municipality involved.”
  • “To obtain a prescriptive easement one must use someone else’s land in a manner that is open, notorious, continuous, exclusive, and adverse for the requisite period of time.”
  • “To obtain a prescriptive easement one must use someone else’s land in a manner that is open, notorious, continuous, exclusive, and adverse for the requisite period of time.”
  • “To obtain a prescriptive easement one must use someone else’s land in a manner that is open, notorious, continuous, exclusive, and adverse for the requisite period of time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greenhill, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

85 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Brooks v. Jones

18 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.