Skip to main content
· 10/10/2001

MacHala v. Weems

Citations

  • 56 S.W.3d 748
  • 2001 WL 947225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that where owner put a gate at entrance to road and gave keys to claimants, claimants use was not adverse because it was with owner’s consent
  • explaining that an easement appurtenant benefits the property to which it is attached; it cannot be separated from the owner’s rights in the land, and it passes with the property
  • explaining that an easement appurtenant benefits the property to which it is attached; it cannot be separated from the owner’s rights in the land, and it passes with the property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelius, Grant, Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.