Brooks v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Barker factors to find, prior to enactment of AEDPA, that a pattern of “inexcusable neglect by a succession of assigned counsel” in state court over an eight-year period justified exempting the petitioner from exhaustion requirement
• eight- 6 year delay in state appeal excused exhaustion where there was a pattern of neglect by counsel and 7 delay by the court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Snyder v. Kelly
  W.D. New York· 1991-07-25· cited 8×
• Sinatra v. Barkley
  E.D. New York· 1990-06-27· cited 2×
• Crawford v. Artuz
  S.D. New York· 2000-09-22· cited 2×
• Simpson v. Keohane
  S.D. New York· 1990-04-10

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Barker v. Wingo
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-22· cited 12,108×
• Jasper Roberson, Relator-Appellant v. State of Connecticut
  Second Circuit· 1974-07-31· cited 74×
• Homer Aki Mathis v. David Hood, Superintendent, Otisville Correctional Facility
  Second Circuit· 1988-07-14· cited 41×
• Wheeler v. Kelly
  E.D. New York· 1986-07-21· cited 32×
• Brooks v. Jones
  Second Circuit· 1989-05-12· cited 30×