Brooks v. Hollaar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that litigant’s “position was . . . consistent throughout” on whether promissory estoppel claim was to be decided by judge or jury because “counsel never made a ‘declaration,’ later contradicted, that could form the basis for judicial estoppel”
• agent may sue on contract in own name to recover principal’s damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).