Knaebel v. Heiner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a party \who seeks the interposition of equity must generally show that he either has no remedy at law or that no legal remedy is adequate\
• explaining that the defense requires proof that the party \perpetrated some wrongdoing\ and \that the wrongful act related to the action being litigated\ (citing Zr-cHartaH Crmaree, Jr, Some Prortems or 1 (1950))
• stating because equitable rescission rather than legal rescission was sought, restoration was not required prior to suit by the plaintiff
• because plaintiff sought equitable rescission rather than legal rescission, neither restoration nor tender was required prior to suit by plaintiff
• because plaintiff sought equitable rescission rather than legal rescission, neither restoration nor tender was required prior to suit by plaintiff
• \One who seeks the interposition of equity must generally show that he either has no remedy at law or that no legal remedy is adequate.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Kracl v. Loseke
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1990-10-05· cited 93×
• Thomas Horras v. American Capital Strategies
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-09-03· cited 71×
• Cook v. Cook
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2011-04-22· cited 39×
• Van Shaack Holdings Ltd. v. Van Schaack
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-01-31· cited 31×
• Retzer v. Retzer
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 1990-12-12· cited 26×
• Thorstenson v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1989-09-22· cited 26×
• Barker v. Ness
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-12-22· cited 17×
• Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC v. Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2016-08-26· cited 14×
• McCarter v. McCarter
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-07-05· cited 13×
• Windel v. Mat-Su Title Insurance Agency, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-07-12· cited 12×
• Henrichs v. Chugach Alaska Corp.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2011-04-22· cited 12×
• Haines v. Comfort Keepers, Inc.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2017-03-24· cited 10×
• Donnybrook Building Supply, Inc. v. Interior City Branch, First National Bank of Anchorage
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1990-09-21· cited 9×
• Moffitt v. Moffitt
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-08-08· cited 9×
• BHP Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Okie
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1992-08-28· cited 7×
• Williams Alaska Petroleum, Inc. and The Williams Companies, Inc. v. State of Alaska, Flint Hills Resources Alaska, LLC, and Flint Hills Resources, LLC
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2023-05-26· cited 6×
• Resqsoft, Inc. v. Protech Solutions, Inc. and State of Alaska, Department of Revenue
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2021-06-18· cited 6×
• Brooks v. Hollaar
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2013-03-22· cited 3×
• Martinez v. Affordable Housing Network, Inc.
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2005-03-21· cited 2×
• Shears v. Myers
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2012-07-20· cited 2×

Other cases named Knaebel v. Heiner

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Knaebel v. Heiner
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1982-05-28· cited 2×
• Knaebel v. Heiner
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1983-12-16· cited 2×