Skip to main content
· 5/13/1983

Knaebel v. Heiner

Citations

  • 663 P.2d 551
  • 1983 Alas. LEXIS 421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a party \who seeks the interposition of equity must generally show that he either has no remedy at law or that no legal remedy is adequate\
  • explaining that the defense requires proof that the party \perpetrated some wrongdoing\ and \that the wrongful act related to the action being litigated\ (citing Zr-cHartaH Crmaree, Jr, Some Prortems or 1 (1950))
  • stating because equitable rescission rather than legal rescission was sought, restoration was not required prior to suit by the plaintiff
  • because plaintiff sought equitable rescission rather than legal rescission, neither restoration nor tender was required prior to suit by plaintiff
  • because plaintiff sought equitable rescission rather than legal rescission, neither restoration nor tender was required prior to suit by plaintiff
  • \One who seeks the interposition of equity must generally show that he either has no remedy at law or that no legal remedy is adequate.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burke, Connor, Matthews, Compton, Souter, Rabinowitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.