Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming permanent injunction where Broadcom sold indirectly competing, non-practicing product, supporting showing of irreparable harm
• finding waiver where parties did not propose that a term be construed at Markman and plaintiff argued for a construction in its post-trial motions
• acknowledging district court’s conclusion that “it is generally in the public interest to uphold patent rights”
• affirming district court holding that party “waived any claimed error by virtue of its failure to offer a proposed construction at or prior to trial”
• discussing the importance of “avoiding immediate market disruptions” when weighing the public interest
• affirming a jury instruction to consider “all of the circumstances” relevant to the alleged induced in- fringement and concluding that “[t]aken as a whole,” the record provided substantial evidence to support the jury verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

76 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-03-10· cited 374×
• Activevideo Networks, Inc. v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-08-24· cited 184×
• Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2011-10-12· cited 138×
• Merial Ltd. v. Cipla Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-05-31· cited 138×
• Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-09-15· cited 136×
• Wordtech Systems, Inc. v. Integrated Networks Solutions, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-06-16· cited 117×
• Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-12-19· cited 97×
• Synqor, Inc. v. Artesyn Technologies, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-03-13· cited 78×
• Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-11-18· cited 74×
• Trebro Manufacturing, Inc. v. Firefly Equipment, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2014-04-09· cited 67×
• Lazare Kaplan International, Inc. v. Photoscribe Technologies, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-12-22· cited 65×
• Function Media, L.L.C v. Google Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2013-02-13· cited 63×
• Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2012-08-29· cited 60×
• Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor Int'l, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-07-03· cited 60×
• Verizon Services Corp. v. Cox Fibernet Virginia, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-04-16· cited 58×
• Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. Greatbatch Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-03-24· cited 53×
• Gpne Corp. v. Apple Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-08-01· cited 45×
• Edwards Lifesciences Ag. v. Corevalve, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-11-13· cited 38×
• Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2016-06-03· cited 38×
• Thermolife International LLC v. Gnc Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2019-05-01· cited 37×

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
• MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.
  Supreme Court· 1996-04-29· cited 3,226×
• Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-25· cited 1,536×
• Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.
  Supreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 1,413×
• Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.
  Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 539×
• 02 Micro International Ltd. v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 533×
• Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.
  Supreme Court· 1908-06-01· cited 504×
• Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-06-15· cited 449×
• Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. Disimone
  Federal Circuit· 1990-10-23· cited 364×
• Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., Ltd
  Federal Circuit· 2006-12-13· cited 310×
• Charles C. Johnston and Gordon P. Ramsey, as Trustees of the Amec Liquidating Trust v. Ivac Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1989-09-27· cited 291×
• Joy Technologies, Inc., and A/s Niro Atomizer, Involuntary v. Flakt, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1993-10-06· cited 255×
• PowerOasis, Inc. v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-04-11· cited 217×
• Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Chemque, Inc. (Formerly Known as Chemque Canada, Ltd.) and Thomas & Betts Corporation, Defendants-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2002-11-04· cited 213×
• Eli Lilly and Company v. Aradigm Corporation, Defendant-Cross
  Federal Circuit· 2004-07-20· cited 207×
• Dr. Sakharam D. Mahurkar v. C.R. Bard, Inc., Davol Inc. And Bard Access Systems, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-05-03· cited 188×
• Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-09-26· cited 186×
• Conoco, Inc. v. Energy & Environmental International, L.C.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-08-17· cited 185×
• ACCO Brands, Inc. v. ABA Locks Manufacturer Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-09-12· cited 170×
• Dawn Equipment Co. v. Kentucky Farms Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1998-03-24· cited 167×