Charles C. Johnston and Gordon P. Ramsey, as Trustees of the Amec Liquidating Trust v. Ivac Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]ttorneys' argument is no substitute for evidence”
• Fed. K. The Accused Device. 91. The Court finds that Defendant offered to sell a system which included inter alia: (1
• “General assertions of fact issues, general denials, and conclusory statements are insufficient to shoulder the non-movant’s burden.” (internal quotation mark omitted)
• when the paten- tee’s claims do not read on the accused device exactly, a finding of no literal infringement on summary judgment is proper
• “To establish infringement of a patent, every limitation set forth in a claim must be found in an accused product or process exactly or by a substantial equivalent.”
• “Where conflicting statements . . . appear in our precedent, the panel is obligated to review the cases and reconcile or explain the statements, if possible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).