M.D. North Carolina· 4/12/1991
Brittain v. Stroh Brewery Co.
Citations
- 136 F.R.D. 408
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6374
- 1991 WL 74777
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting parallel Rule 26 (c), Fed.R.Civ.P., to require that a motion for a protective order be filed in a timely or seasonable manner
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eliason
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. North Bridge Associates, Inc.First Circuit· 1994-05-02· cited 191×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. Henry D. KnightThird Circuit· 1993-04-08· cited 140×
- U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.D. Nevada· 2006-08-22· cited 122×
- Tilley v. United StatesM.D. North Carolina· 2003-07-11· cited 53×
- United States v. Duke Energy Corp.M.D. North Carolina· 2003-10-22· cited 38×
- Rolscreen Co. v. Pella Products of St. Louis, Inc.S.D. Iowa· 1992-11-23· cited 32×
- Frideres v. SchiltzS.D. Iowa· 1993-06-30· cited 29×
- Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama· 2000-12-22· cited 27×
- Ex Parte Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-02-27· cited 24×
- Dorsett v. County of NassauE.D. New York· 2011-08-08· cited 24×
- Dunford v. Rolly Marine Service Co.S.D. Florida· 2005-12-01· cited 23×
- Ex Parte Horton Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2000-05-26· cited 22×
- Pincheira v. Allstate InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-08-05· cited 22×
- Bucher v. Richardson Hospital AuthorityN.D. Texas· 1994-12-13· cited 22×
- Drexel Heritage Furnishings, Inc. v. Furniture USA, Inc.M.D. North Carolina· 2001-04-18· cited 19×
- Static Control Components, Inc. v. Darkprint ImagingM.D. North Carolina· 2001-06-11· cited 18×
- Ayers v. Continental Casualty Co.N.D. West Virginia· 2007-01-08· cited 18×
- Mason C. Day Excavating, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.M.D. North Carolina· 1992-08-24· cited 13×
- Pro Billiards Tour Ass'n v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.M.D. North Carolina· 1999-06-18· cited 11×
- United States v. Duke Energy Corp.M.D. North Carolina· 2003-04-11· cited 11×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court· 1981-06-01· cited 973×
- In Re Adele HalkinD.C. Circuit· 1979-01-31· cited 151×
- Francis S.L. Wang v. Paul Hsu C v. Chen Kwan Tao Li Lee and Li, a Partnership, D. Michael Clayton, Movant-AppellantTenth Circuit· 1990-11-15· cited 86×
- Reliance Insurance v. Barron'sS.D. New York· 1977-03-16· cited 41×
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.S.D. New York· 1978-07-19· cited 32×
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.S.D. New York· 1976-02-18· cited 30×
- Maritime Cinema Service Corp. v. Movies En Route, Inc.S.D. New York· 1973-10-23· cited 28×
- Nestle Foods Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.D. New Jersey· 1990-01-26· cited 23×
- Parkway Gallery Furniture, Inc. v. Kittinger/Pennsylvania House Group, Inc.M.D. North Carolina· 1988-08-17· cited 21×
- Spartanics, Ltd. v. Dynetics Engineering Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1972-01-14· cited 18×
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. CFR Associates, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1989-03-28· cited 16×
- Triangle Ink & Color Co. v. Sherwin-Williams Co.N.D. Illinois· 1974-01-04· cited 14×
- Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1990-06-26· cited 12×
- In re Air Crash Disaster at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on August 16, 1987E.D. Michigan· 1989-04-13· cited 11×
- Georgia Television Co. v. TV News Clips of Atlanta, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 1989-07-13· cited 8×
- Duracell Inc. v. SW Consultants, Inc.N.D. Georgia· 1989-05-17· cited 7×
- Deines v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.D. Kansas· 1990-10-26· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.