Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• allowing in-house counsel access to confidential information because “[gjiven the technical nature of this case, the advice of in-house counsel with specialized knowledge of the steel industry could be essential to the proper handling of this litigation by outside counsel”
• in-house counsel’s access to confidential information “should turn on the in-house counsel’s involvement in ‘competitive decisionmaking’ ”
• some, even highly relevant, information might be kept from direct competitors
• one in-house attorney could examine documents covered by protective order when he averred that he “had absolutely no involvement” in competitive decisionmaking, but another could not when he only averred having “no direct responsibility or authority” in competitive decisionmaking
• applying rationale to in house counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brittain v. Stroh Brewery Co.
  M.D. North Carolina· 1991-04-12· cited 51×
• United States v. Dentsply International, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1999-06-11· cited 13×
• Digital Equipment Corp. v. Micro Technology, Inc.
  D. Colorado· 1992-07-01· cited 9×
• Federal Trade Commission v. Sysco Corporation
  District of Columbia· 2015-03-12· cited 8×
• Volvo Penta of the Americas, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp.
  E.D. Virginia· 1999-05-13· cited 4×
• Ares-Serono, Inc. v. Organon International B.V.
  D. Massachusetts· 1993-07-21· cited 3×
• Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-03-24· cited 1×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• U.S. Steel Corporation v. The United States and U.S. International Trade Commission, and Cosipa, Intervenors
  Federal Circuit· 1984-03-23· cited 180×
• American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1987-08-31· cited 131×
• Ball Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Mutual Hospital Insurance
  Seventh Circuit· 1986-03-04· cited 72×
• Federal Trade Commission v. Exxon Corporation
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-12-23· cited 70×
• Akzo N. V. v. United States International Trade Commission
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-01· cited 69×
• Johnson Foils, Inc. v. Huyck Corp.
  N.D. New York· 1973-09-07· cited 38×
• Safe Flight Instrument Corp. v. Sundstrand Data Control Inc.
  D. Delaware· 1988-03-24· cited 28×
• A. Hirsh, Inc. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1987-03-27· cited 21×
• D & L Supply Co. v. United States
  Court of International Trade· 1988-08-16· cited 9×
• Davis v. General Motors Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 1974-09-09· cited 5×

Other cases named Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-10-16· cited 8×
• Carpenter Technology Corp. v. Armco, Inc.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-03-24· cited 1×