Skip to main content

Britt v. State

Citations

  • 931 So. 2d 209
  • 2006 WL 1559742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that defendant’s “pro se filings have become frivolous, an abuse of process, and a waste of the taxpayers’ money”
  • finding that defendant’s pro se filings had become frivolous, an abuse of process, and a waste of the taxpayers’ money
  • ruling defendant's pro se filings were frivolous, an abuse of process, and a waste of the taxpayers' money
  • finding that defendant’s pro se filings had become frivolous, an abuse of process, and a waste of the taxpayers’ money
  • finding that defendant’s pro se filings had become frivolous, an abuse of process, and a waste of the taxpayers’ money
  • finding that defendant’s pro se filings had become frivolous, an abuse of process, and a waste of the taxpayers’ money

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Palmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.