Crittenden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] per curiam affirmance without opinion is not an indication that the case was not considered on the merits.”
• “We reiterate that a per curiam affirmance without opinion is not an indication that the case was not considered on the merits. Each and every appeal receives the same degree of attention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mackle Vincent Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
  Eleventh Circuit· 2012-08-24· cited 94×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-24

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Spencer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-09-23· cited 837×
• Isley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-03· cited 269×
• In Re McDonald
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 230×
• McCrae v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-15· cited 94×
• Britt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-09· cited 22×
• Henderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-20· cited 10×
• Crittenden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-13· cited 5×
• Floyd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-10· cited 5×
• Bauer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-03· cited 4×
• Elliott v. Elliott
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-30· cited 4×
• Durr v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-25· cited 2×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-08-20· cited 1×
• Fox v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-05-18· cited 1×
• Crittenden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-22· cited 1×