Freeman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that it is necessary to limit successive claims to give due weight to the finality and presumption of legality of a final judgment and to restore the public’s confidence in our criminal system of justice
• holding that there is a need to limit successive claims to give due weight to the finality and presumption of legality of a final judgment and to restore the public's confidence in our criminal system of justice
• noting the need for a limit on successiveness necessary to give due weight to finality and presumption of legality of final judgment and to restore public's confidence in our criminal system of justice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Britt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-09· cited 22×
• Wallace v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-19· cited 2×
• Weidmann v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-21

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Baker v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2004-03-11· cited 1,190×
• State v. Spencer
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-09-23· cited 837×
• Isley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-03-03· cited 269×
• Proctor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-04-08· cited 12×
• Gaffney v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-07-30· cited 8×
• Freeman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-13· cited 3×