N.D. Georgia· 3/9/2017

Brignac v. United States

Citations

239 F. Supp. 3d 1367
2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41191
2017 WL 1080927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that a “negligent hiring and retention claim is a ‘related function’ to the provision of medical services” because defendant medical care facility was required by the FSHCAA to vet physicians
holding a defendant health center immune from a negligent hiring claim because, “to become a deemed entity in the first place,” 42 U.S.C. § 233(h
holding 8 plaintiff’s negligent hiring and retention claim “arguably sounds in medical 9 malpractice[.]”
explaining the plaintiff’s “negligent hiring and retention claim is a ‘related function’ to the provision of medical services” because the defendant, a medical care facility, was required to vet physicians under FSHCAA
explaining the plaintiff’s “negligent hiring and retention claim is a ‘related function’ to the provision of medical services” because the defendant, a medical care facility, was required to vet physicians under FSHCAA
explaining the plaintiff’s “negligent hiring and retention claim is a ‘related function’ to the provision of medical services” because the defendant, a medical care facility, was required to vet physicians under FSHCAA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Totenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.