· 3/12/2002
OSI, Inc. v. United States
Citations
- 285 F.3d 947
- 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20501
- 54 ERC (BNA) 1020
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3780
- 2002 WL 384158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “an agency manual which provides only objectives and principles for a government agent to follow does not create a mandatory directive”
- holding that “since the government has asserted lack of subject matter jurisdiction, OSI must prove that the discretionary function exception does not apply to the disposal of the landfill material”
- explaining that plaintiff bore the burden of proving that the discretionary function exception did not apply
- Military’s disposal of waste on a base “weigh[s] environmental policies against security and military concerns”
- “In the face of a factual challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that jurisdiction exists.”
- “The nature of the military’s function requires that it be free to weigh environmental policies against security and military concerns”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Dubina, Mills
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.