Skip to main content
· 3/12/2002

OSI, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 285 F.3d 947
  • 32 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20501
  • 54 ERC (BNA) 1020
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3780
  • 2002 WL 384158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “an agency manual which provides only objectives and principles for a government agent to follow does not create a mandatory directive”
  • holding that “since the government has asserted lack of subject matter jurisdiction, OSI must prove that the discretionary function exception does not apply to the disposal of the landfill material”
  • explaining that plaintiff bore the burden of proving that the discretionary function exception did not apply
  • Military’s disposal of waste on a base “weigh[s] environmental policies against security and military concerns”
  • “In the face of a factual challenge to subject matter jurisdiction, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove that jurisdiction exists.”
  • “The nature of the military’s function requires that it be free to weigh environmental policies against security and military concerns”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Dubina, Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.