Mike Tonelli Cindy Tonelli v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the federal government is immune from negligent hiring claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act
• holding that the post office’s failure to terminate an employee despite notice of “illegal behavior . . . d[id] not represent a choice based on plausible policy considerations”
• stating that \issues of employee supervision and retention generally fall within the discretionary function exception\
• holding that the discretionary function exception did not apply when the post office had notice that one of its employees was sifting through mail and removing items and did nothing about it
• stating that “issues of employee supervision and retention generally fall within the discretionary function exception”
• affirming summary judg- ment against plaintiffs who “did not provide sufficient details” regarding alleged misconduct by unnamed postal employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).