Brightwell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, based on the subsequent actions of the trial court and the silence of defense 15 counsel, verdict was unanimous even though transcript did not reflect an affirmative response from the jury”
• holding that, based on the subsequent actions of the trial court and the silence of defense 15 counsel, verdict was unanimous even though transcript did not reflect an affirmative response from the jury”
• “Sentences corresponding to verdicts of conviction that were not properly finalized have been, under certain circumstances, held to be illegal.”
• “Sentences corresponding to verdicts of conviction that were not properly finalized have been, under certain circumstances, held to be illegal.”
• “Sentences corresponding to verdicts of conviction that were not properly finalized have been, under certain circumstances, held to be illegal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Colvin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-11-30· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chaney v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-03-14· cited 110×
• State v. Wilkins
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-09· cited 47×
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-20· cited 44×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1883-06-20· cited 27×
• Givens v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1893-01-12· cited 27×
• In Re Joshua W.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-08· cited 26×
• Rollins v. Capital Plaza Associates, L.P.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-04· cited 23×
• State v. Santiago
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-12-21· cited 21×