Bridges v. Bridges

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Florida law does not recognize cohabitation as a basis for automatic termination of court ordered alimony
• holding that Florida law does not recognize cohabitation as a basis for automatic termination of court ordered alimony
• concluding that it is appropriate to make a nominal alimony award to protect a former spouse's interests should that spouse experience a significant change in circumstances
• agreeing that Florida law does not recognize cohabitation as a basis for automatic termination of court ordered alimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Donoff v. Donoff
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-01· cited 23×
• Buxton v. Buxton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-05· cited 17×
• Linstroth v. Dorgan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-11· cited 8×
• Esteva v. Rodriguez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28· cited 5×
• Tanner v. Tanner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-21

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• DePoorter v. DePoorter
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-12· cited 42×
• Blanchard v. Blanchard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-02-09· cited 25×
• Lee v. Lee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-06-09· cited 13×
• Long v. Long
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-13· cited 9×
• Ellis v. Ellis
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-05· cited 7×
• MacLaren v. MacLaren
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-22· cited 5×