Long v. Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an increase in income because of cost-of-living and merit raises could have been anticipated at the time of dissolution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rosen v. Rosen
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-24· cited 318×
• Young v. Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-26· cited 31×
• Buxton v. Buxton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-05· cited 17×
• Mott v. Mott
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-16· cited 9×
• Arouza v. Arouza
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-12-06· cited 8×
• Singleton v. Singleton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-23· cited 6×
• Bridges v. Bridges
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-15· cited 6×
• Kamenski v. Kamenski
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-07-29· cited 2×
• Cheney v. Cheney
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-18

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Tinsley v. Tinsley
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-18· cited 10×
• Cowie v. Cowie
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-06-29· cited 9×
• Townsend v. Townsend
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-06· cited 7×
• McCall v. McCall
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-07· cited 7×
• Sullivan v. Sullivan
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-12· cited 4×