District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/31/2005
Briceno v. Sprint Spectrum, LP
Citations
- 911 So. 2d 176
- 2005 WL 2093681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that Florida courts will generally enforce choice of law provisions contained in an agreement
- affirming motion to compel arbitration under Kansas state law, noting “Florida courts ‘will generally enforce choice-of-law provisions unless the law of the chosen forum contravenes strong public policy’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wells and Cortiãas, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kolsky v. Jackson Square, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-24· cited 23×
- Waterhouse Const. Group v. 5891 Sw 64th St.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-02-07· cited 10×
- Morales v. PerezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-28· cited 7×
- National Financial Services, LLC v. MahanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-10-14· cited 4×
- Marshall, Amaya & Anton v. Arnold-DobalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-30· cited 2×
- Metropcs Communications, Inc. v. PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-15· cited 2×
- INTERNET ESCROW SERVICES, INC., etc. v. KENNETH HENDELDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-02-03
- South Miami Pharmacy, Inc., etc. v. OptumRx, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-07-10
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court· 1996-06-03· cited 1,668×
- Mazzoni Farms, Inc. v. EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-08· cited 131×
- Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-05-08· cited 120×
- Steinhardt v. RudolphDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-17· cited 63×
- Stanley A. Klopp, Inc. v. John Deere Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1981-03-23· cited 39×
- Voicestream Wireless v. US CommunicationsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-24· cited 27×
- Adams v. John Deere Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1989-05-12· cited 25×
- Meyer v. Diesel Equipment Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1977-08-12· cited 15×
- Walls v. Quick & Reilly, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-30· cited 15×
- Tropical Ford, Inc. v. MajorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-17· cited 9×
- Baron v. Best Buy Co., Inc.S.D. Florida· 1999-12-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.