Skip to main content
· 5/8/1976

Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 549 P.2d 903
  • 219 Kan. 755
  • 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 447
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the KCPA is not designed to remedy “the consequences per se of uneven bargaining power or even a simple old-fashioned bad bargain”
  • finding limitation of liability enforceable where no indication contract was unconscionable or that defendant acted with gross-negligence
  • same, where terms and conditions were set out in “clearly legible type” and were “not couched in confusing terms”
  • an advertiser who had been left out of the yellow pages sought to avoid enforcement of contractual limitation on remedies
  • an advertiser who had been left out of the yellow pages sought to avoid enforcement of contractual limitation on remedies
  • lists 10 factors that aid in applying the doctrine of unconscionability but in situations involving the Uniform Commercial Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.