· 5/8/1976
Wille v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Citations
- 549 P.2d 903
- 219 Kan. 755
- 19 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 447
- 1976 Kan. LEXIS 422
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the KCPA is not designed to remedy “the consequences per se of uneven bargaining power or even a simple old-fashioned bad bargain”
- finding limitation of liability enforceable where no indication contract was unconscionable or that defendant acted with gross-negligence
- same, where terms and conditions were set out in “clearly legible type” and were “not couched in confusing terms”
- an advertiser who had been left out of the yellow pages sought to avoid enforcement of contractual limitation on remedies
- an advertiser who had been left out of the yellow pages sought to avoid enforcement of contractual limitation on remedies
- lists 10 factors that aid in applying the doctrine of unconscionability but in situations involving the Uniform Commercial Code
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.