Skip to main content
Eleventh Circuit· 8/29/2016

Brent Jacoby v. Baldwin County

Citations

  • 835 F.3d 1338
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 15929
  • 2016 WL 4506051

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that we must ask whether any “legitimate goal” was served by the prison conditions and whether the conditions are “reasonably related” to that goal
  • stating that “[a] pretrial detainee . . . may not be punished for his misconduct while in prison unless he is given a due process hearing
  • “[w]e hold that … [plaintiff pretrial detainee] was entitled to the due process protections enshrined in Wolff before being placed in disciplinary segregation”
  • “[w]e hold that … [plaintiff pretrial detainee] was entitled to the due process protections enshrined in Wolff before being placed in disciplinary segregation”
  • “To [overcome qualified immunity], the plaintiff must: (1) allege facts that establish that the officer violated his constitutional rights; and (2
  • “Sandin leaves intact [Wolfish]’s holding that a detainee may not be punished prior to an adjudication of guilt in accordance with due process of law.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin, Jordan, Vinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.