Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/25/1985

Brennan v. Hobson

Citations

  • 470 U.S. 1084
  • 105 S. Ct. 1843
  • 85 L. Ed. 2d 142
  • 53 U.S.L.W. 3687
  • 1985 U.S. LEXIS 1573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant entitled to dismissal on qualified immunity plea unless plaintiff states a claim of violation of clearly established law
  • “predicate acts” for section 1962’s first three subsections include only “racketeering activity” as described in section 1961(1)
  • absolute immunity is not \a mere defense to liability\; its \essence\ is \its possessor's entitlement not to have to ... stand trial or face the other burdens of litigation \
  • defendant entitled to dismissal on qualified immunity plea unless plaintiff states a claim of violation of clearly established law
  • absolute immunity is not “a mere defense to liability”; its “essence” is “its possessor’s entitlement not to have to ... stand trial or face the other burdens of litigation ”
  • \Harlow ... purged qualified immunity doctrine of its subjective components\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.