Skip to main content
· 1/19/1988

Orlikow v. United States

Citations

  • 682 F. Supp. 77
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2118
  • 1988 WL 20851

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that articles do not necessarily place plaintiffs on notice when •there is no evidence that the plaintiffs read the articles
  • concluding that reasonable diligence did not include discovery of newspaper articles, a book, and television programs available in the plaintiffs’ community
  • \Without actual notice or without having read the articles it would go too far to state that the statute of limitations began to run when the articles were published. The trier of fact must resolve the issue of diligence and notice.\
  • both involving CIA drug experiments on unwitting subjects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John Garrett Penn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.