Russell C. Larson v. Northrop Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that former Gafco employee's employment relationship with Northrop ended under terms of Plan II when Northrop sold Gafco to AICI
• finding that plaintiffs must not have been on notice about evidence of a fiduciary breach, “despite their exercise of diligence”
• holding that tolling on fraudulent concealment grounds was unavailable where the plaintiff “failed to plead fraud or concealment (i.e., fraudulent concealment), and raised the issue for the first time in his opposition to [the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment”
• holding “allega- tions of fraudulent concealment, which toll the statute of limi- tations, must meet the [particularity] requirements of” Rule 9(b
• finding that ALJ properly 22 translated moderate mental limitations assessed by one doctor 23 into “concrete restriction[]” of limitation to “simple tasks”
• finding error in failing to include postural limitations harmless 22 because positions relied upon required at most infrequent postural activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).