Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/16/1980
Branch v. State
Citations
- 599 S.W.2d 324
- 1980 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1047
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no statutory presumption regarding the evidence to prove possession with intent to deliver.”
- evidence factually sufficient although no paraphernalia found on defendant and no apparent testimony as to street value of substance confiscated
- considering amount of contraband and cash
- considering amount of contraband and cash
- rev'd on rehearing on other grounds
- rev’d on rehearing on other grounds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clinton, Douglas, Davis, Dally
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Williams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1995-01-25· cited 151×
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-12-29· cited 138×
- Reece v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1994-06-09· cited 120×
- Gabriel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-08· cited 77×
- Kibble v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2011-05-11· cited 72×
- Smith v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1987-09-28· cited 58×
- Ex Parte RogersTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-11-29· cited 22×
- Morr v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-21· cited 15×
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1985-12-19· cited 14×
- Adams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-02· cited 11×
- Robertson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-05-12· cited 8×
- Hawkins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-01-08· cited 6×
- Marara Jean Kibble v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2010-12-02
- Joe Bone v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2003-04-03
- Judah T. Moser v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1993-05-19
- James Ronald Gorman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2003-01-16
- Gabriel, Juan Dejesus v. Texas, the State OfTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1995-03-08
- Bennie L. Collins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-06-15
- Dearmon, Milton Douglas v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-03-30
- Denito Norman v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-07-12
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 2,373×
- Gustafson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1973-12-11· cited 699×
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-06-14· cited 126×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-03-10· cited 106×
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-12-18· cited 62×
- Daygee v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1973-10-12· cited 61×
- Duncantell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-03-15· cited 55×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-06-12· cited 51×
- McCall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-09-15· cited 38×
- Tores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-02-05· cited 37×
- Beck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-07-07· cited 37×
- United States v. Clinton JohnsonFifth Circuit· 1972-12-04· cited 30×
- State v. SibleySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1975-03-31· cited 30×
- Imhoff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-03-28· cited 19×
- State v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court· 1973-10-12· cited 9×
- Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-10-24· cited 7×
- Sherer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-12· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.